THANOS TSIOUSIS

07. Atopia

“The goals, the voices, the reality—all this seductiveness that lures and loads us on, that we pursue and plunge into…” — Robert Musil

The Atopia series unfolds through a set of prints where figures appear less as representations of the past than as agents of thought. Borrowing from the aesthetics of tarot, comics, and allegorical imagery, these forms act like emblems of a world in formation.

Woodcut is redefined here as a medium carrying its historical and symbolic weight, as in old books and manuscripts, transforming each figure into an emblematic expression of a world in the making. Each figure does not define a specific person or role; it introduces an open code that invites the viewer to rethink concepts.

Atopia does not refer to a specific place, but to a state without certainties. In this unstable condition, the figures acquire the weight of carriers of questions: they hold traces of a world that may come into being, or that may have already existed in another version of reality.

As an artistic project, Atopia functions as an experimental system of thought. It explores how images can generate not only aesthetic experience, but also propositions for how we imagine ourselves, our social relationships, and our collective narratives in the future.

Woodcut print titled 'On Certainty I' from the Atopia series.
On Certainty I, 2016,
Woodcut on 300gsm paper, 17.4 × 24.9 cm,
photo credits: Studio Vaharidis
Woodcut print titled 'Girl as Bonaria' from the Atopia series.
Girl as Bonaria, 2016,
Woodcut on 300gsm paper, 17.4 × 24.9 cm,
photo credits: Studio Vaharidis

Girl as Bonaria

The woodcut Girl as Bonaria takes its title from the Italian self-taught artist Bonaria Manca, a figure of art brut who shaped a deeply personal, almost oracular visual universe. Here, the girl’s form is not presented as a portrait but as a proposition: how can spontaneous, marginal creation be read as a future-oriented proposal for rethinking art and the self?

The card invites us to consider:

  • What does “raw” creation mean within a culture structured by institutions?
  • How might the childlike or outsider gaze suggest alternative forms of memory and identity?
  • Can the marginal voice become the central site of a new collective mythology?